Understanding the Problem
Initial Research & Discovery
When I joined the project, I conducted an audit of our existing user data, which revealed some concerning patterns:
🔻 High drop-off rates during onboarding (62% compared to 31% in US markets)
💬 Confusion around beauty feature terminology (78% of negative reviews mentioned this)
💎 Lower usage of premium features despite similar subscription rates to Western markets
🌏 Cultural misalignment in beauty standards (foundation shades, facial features, etc.)
Heuristic Evaluation
I led a heuristic evaluation with both Western and Asian UX experts to identify usability issues from different cultural perspectives. Our analysis highlighted 5 critical areas for improvement:
🧠 Mental Models: Western-centric feature organization didn't match Asian users' expectations
🈷️ Translation Gaps: Direct translations missed cultural context and beauty terminology
🌏 Cultural Representation: Default templates and examples lacked diversity in Asian features
👩🎨 Feature Presentation: Premium features valued by Asian users were buried in the UI
📱 Navigation Patterns: Information architecture didn't align with common Asian app patterns
Research Phase
Competitor Analysis
I conducted a comprehensive analysis of top photo editing apps in our target markets:
This analysis revealed several key opportunities:
🔍 Emphasis on "natural-looking" enhancements
🎭 More granular control for specific Asian features
🤳 Social sharing integrations with regional platforms
🌈 Culturally-appropriate beauty templates and presets


User Survey
I designed and conducted a survey with 1,200+ users across China, Korea, and Japan. The findings were illuminating:
🤔 73% found terminology confusing or misleading
🌍 68% wanted region-specific beauty standards as default options
👤 82% felt the app didn't recognize their specific features well
📚 91% preferred apps with localized examples and tutorials

Usability Testing
Working with local research teams, I conducted 45 moderated usability tests across China. Key findings included:
🤔 Feature discovery was hindered by unfamiliar categorization
🧩 Users expected different grouping of tools (e.g., skin tone and foundation considered separate in Western markets but related in Asian markets)
🎯 Task completion rates were 38% lower than in Western markets
🗣️ Voice-guided tutorials were often misunderstood due to translation issues

Card Sorting for Feature Reorganization
I facilitated remote card sorting sessions with 80 participants to understand their mental models:
Show Image
The results guided our information architecture redesign:
⭐ "Skin perfection" became the primary category (vs. "Basic edits" in Western markets)
🌟 "Eyes enhancement" warranted its own dedicated section
🍐 Body shape features needed more nuanced categorization
🎨 Filter organization better aligned with local aesthetic preferences
